Trust

Methodology

Open Retreat publishes listings only when claims can be tied to a source. We do not invent affiliate IDs, invent listings, or claim a visit without visit metadata. If we cannot check something, we say so on the listing.

Verification levels

Every sourced claim carries one of four levels. They are never collapsed into a single “verified” badge.

Source checked
A primary public source was opened and the claim matches what that source currently says.
Cross-source confirmed
Two or more independent sources agree on the same claim.
Owner confirmed
The operator, teacher, or venue confirmed the claim directly.
Visited
Someone from Open Retreat attended, with visit date and notes on record.

Refresh states

Each listing carries a refresh state so stale pages are not silently treated as current. The default is manual_check_required. Volatile claims such as prices and dates are re-checked where automation allows; when a source cannot be re-checked, the listing shows that rather than guessing.

Fresh
The source was re-checked and nothing changed.
Update pending review
The source changed since our last check; the update is awaiting review.
Source unavailable
The source we relied on could not be reached. Treat the claim with caution.
Source conflict
Two sources disagree. The conflict is shown rather than resolved by guesswork.
May be outdated
The information is old enough that it may no longer be accurate.
Manual check needed
This claim has not yet been re-checked by a person.

What we include

What we exclude

Money

Some outbound links — including BookRetreats — may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you. Affiliate links use rel="sponsored" and carry a disclosure next to the booking action. Donation-based centres are always no-commission. Editorial inclusion follows this methodology, not payment.

Corrections

If something is wrong, email hello@openretreat.com.au or use the corrections page. We re-check sources before changing published records.